Project Chintan

Dissent and Dialogue: How Gen Z is Modernizing India’s Classic Mentorship Traditions

The traditional guru-sishya parampara is transitioning from rigid hierarchy to a collaborative model driven by student agency and digital access. Young artists now demand transparent communication and critical inquiry, forcing veterans to move beyond the role of sole knowledge custodians.

By Project Chintan Newsroom
29 July 2026 · 2 min read
Dissent and Dialogue: How Gen Z is Modernizing India’s Classic Mentorship Traditions

From Pedestals to Partnerships

This year’s Guru Purnima served as a backdrop for a notable cultural shift. Recent student-led protests and a wave of collective introspection have emboldened young practitioners of Indian classical arts to assert their agency. The result is a fundamental restructuring of the guru-sishya parampara, moving away from unilateral authority toward a more interactive exchange. While social media facilitates this transition by democratizing access to information, the core of the change lies in the evolving philosophy of the teachers themselves.

Veteran Bharatanatyam exponents Shantha and V.P. Dhananjayan acknowledge that the traditional model may no longer be practical in today's world. Despite their roots at Kalakshetra under Rukmini Devi, where immersive campus living defined their education, the Dhananjayans recently adapted their approach. They argue that a guru cannot occupy an untouchable pedestal. Instead, they emphasize emotional mentorship and open communication. For them, a student visiting from the U.S. to pay respects at their home signifies a lifelong bond that outweighs mere technical success on stage.

The Legacy of Critical Inquiry

The late Kathak pioneer Kumudini Lakhia was an early champion of this modernized dynamic. Decades ago, she challenged the strict mandates of male gurus to develop her own choreographic vocabulary. Her disciple, Aditi Mangaldas, continues this legacy by encouraging students to avoid mindless replication. Mangaldas notes that her company of Gen Z artists insists on dialogue rather than being talked down to. She views their "tough questions" not as dissent, but as a deep engagement with the craft that prevents the creation of artistic clones.

Information Versus Wisdom in the Digital Age

Carnatic musician Rithvik Raja observes that technology has stripped gurus of their status as the sole gatekeepers of knowledge. Because students can access archives, lectures, and recordings instantly, the teacher's role has shifted toward cultivating aesthetic sensitivity and discernment. Raja highlights several key pillars of this new relationship:

  • Discernment: Helping students filter vast amounts of information into actual wisdom.
  • Independent Thinking: Teaching students how to think rather than what to think.
  • Intellectual Freedom: Recognizing that disagreement is a tool for artistic growth, not a sign of disrespect.

Bharatanatyam artist Meera Sreenarayanan points out that the modern guru must navigate multiple roles as performers, administrators, and public figures. This multitasking reality, combined with student mobility, means the intense immersion of the past is often replaced by more transactional or institutional interactions. However, as Raja suggests, the bond is not weakened by this shift; it is strengthened by the honesty and transparency required of both parties in a contemporary setting.

Source: The Hindu – Entertainment

Related stories