Supreme Court Criticizes FSSAI Over Delayed Food Warning Labels

The Supreme Court has sharply criticized the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), the nation's food regulator, for its failure to implement front-of-pack warning labels on packaged food products. These labels are intended to indicate levels of sugar, salt, and saturated fat.

What Happened

A Bench led by Justice J.B. Pardiwala questioned the FSSAI's progress on the issue during a hearing on August 13, 2026. The court asked if the regulator was prioritizing children's health. The proceedings were initiated following a petition by the Kerala-based NGO, 3S and Our Health Society, which urged the central government to mandate such warning labels. Justice Pardiwala expressed frustration with the lack of movement on the matter, asking if the FSSAI would act voluntarily or if a court order would be necessary.

Background

During the hearing, Additional Solicitor General Brijender Chahar indicated that the FSSAI had previously filed an affidavit stating that front-of-pack labelling aligns with international practices and offers consumers simplified nutritional information. However, the court appeared unconvinced by the FSSAI's delay.

Key Facts

• The Supreme Court criticized the FSSAI on August 13, 2026.
• The criticism concerns the FSSAI's delay in introducing front-of-pack warning labels on packaged food.
• These labels would indicate sugar, salt, and saturated fat content.
• A petition filed by the Kerala-based NGO, 3S and Our Health Society, prompted the hearing.
• The NGO sought directions for the Centre to introduce these labels.
• A Bench headed by Justice J.B. Pardiwala presided over the hearing.
• Additional Solicitor General Brijender Chahar represented the government.
• An FSSAI affidavit mentioned that front-of-pack labelling is in line with global practices.