SC notices Centre, state on plea for CBI probe into JPSC exam irregularities
The Supreme Court issued notices to the Centre and Jharkhand government on a petition seeking a time-bound CBI probe into alleged malpractices in the JPSC Preliminary Examination. The petition argues for an independent inquiry to assess the entire exam process and preserve evidence.
Key takeaways
- The Supreme Court has issued notices to the Centre and Jharkhand authorities regarding a plea for a CBI probe into alleged JPSC exam irregularities.
- The petition seeks an independent, time-bound inquiry covering the entire examination process and securing evidentiary material.
- The petition argues for transferring the investigation from the state CID to the CBI to ensure impartiality in examining public officials and the exam body.
What Happened
The Supreme Court, in a hearing before a bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana, issued notices to the Centre and the Jharkhand state government regarding a plea for an independent, time-bound CBI probe into alleged irregularities in the Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2025.
The petition, filed in public interest by activist Harisharan Devgan and represented by advocate Satyam Singh Rajput, seeks transfer of the investigation from the state CID to the Central Bureau of Investigation to ensure impartial scrutiny of public officials and the examining agency.
Advocacy for a wide-ranging audit covers the entire examination chain, including paper preparation, printing, storage, distribution, conduct, evaluation, and publication of results, as well as the security of physical and digital evidence such as OMR sheets, CCTV footage, and server audit logs.
The petition asserts that the question is whether the preliminary examination can be reliably relied upon, and emphasizes that the remedy sought is an independent, comprehensive, and time-bound probe by the CBI rather than a mere reconsideration of individual candidates or isolated incidents.
Why It Matters
The court’s move signals a potential shift toward an external, independent inquiry into exam integrity in Jharkhand, with implications for how examination irregularities are investigated and how public confidence in civil service selections is maintained. The case frames the issue as a systemic inquiry rather than a narrow review of specific incidents.
Background
The Jharkhand Public Service Commission conducted the Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Preliminary Competitive Examination 2025 on April 19, 2026, under Advertisement No. 01/2026. The petition urges a probe into alleged malpractices in this examination and requests that the investigation be transferred to the CBI to ensure impartiality.
Key Facts
- Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana heard the case and issued notices.
- The plea was filed in public interest by activist Harisharan Devgan, represented by advocate Satyam Singh Rajput.
- The examination in question is the Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Preliminary Examination 2025, conducted on April 19, 2026, pursuant to Advertisement No. 01/2026.
- The petition seeks a transfer of investigation from the state CID to the CBI for an independent inquiry.
- The scope of the requested inquiry includes the entire examination chain—from paper preparation to result publication—and securing physical/digital evidence (OMR sheets, CCTV footage, server logs).
What Happens Next
The court has asked for a response from the Union government, the Jharkhand government, the Jharkhand Public Service Commission, and others. A formal examination of the request for a CBI probe and any subsequent orders or directions will depend on the responses submitted and the court’s assessment of the need for an independent inquiry.
Sources reviewed
Project Chintan independently synthesized and analyzed information cross-checked across the sources listed above.
Related stories
SC bans construction within 100m of Jojari River Rajasthan
SC to hear plea for CBI probe into Jharkhand exam irregularities
Congress questions prorogation delay, questions 2/3 majority for delimitation bill
