Project Chintan

Bombay High Court Challenges Police Inaction in Disha Salian Death Investigation

Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande questioned why the Mumbai Police failed to register an FIR despite murder allegations from the victim's father. The court also highlighted a five-year delay in providing autopsy reports to the family.

· 2 min read
Updated

Key takeaways

  • The Bombay High Court questioned why an FIR was never filed in the Disha Salian death case despite murder suspicions raised by her father.
  • Forensic reports submitted by the family claim body placement and injuries are inconsistent with a fall from the 14th floor.
  • Police delayed Disha Salian's autopsy for three days, whereas Sushant Singh Rajput's was conducted within 24 hours.
  • The court ordered the petitioner to create a detailed chronology of events to determine if a cognizable offense took place.
The Bombay High Court building where judges are presiding over the Disha Salian death investigation hearing.
The Bombay High Court building where judges are presiding over the Disha Salian death investigation hearing.

Judicial Scrutiny of Mumbai Police Procedures

The Bombay High Court has demanded an explanation from law enforcement regarding the 2020 death of Disha Salian, former manager to actor Sushant Singh Rajput. During a hearing on August 3, 2026, a division bench comprising Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Manjusha Deshpande focused on the police's refusal to file a First Information Report (FIR). The court expressed concern over the State's failure to provide accidental death and post-mortem reports to the family for half a decade.

Discrepancies in Forensic Findings

Satish Salian, the petitioner and father of the deceased, is challenging the official police finding of suicide. His legal counsel, Advocate Nilesh Ojha, presented several irregularities to the bench. Evidence submitted included a report from private forensic experts suggesting the physical evidence did not align with a fall from a 14th-floor height. Specifically, the body was discovered 10 feet away from the building's base rather than directly below, and it lacked the expected injury patterns for such a descent. Furthermore, the petitioner alleged that investigators only allowed him to view a photograph of his daughter rather than the body itself, and that photographs of bloodstains at the scene appeared to be digitally altered.

State Defense and Case Timeline

Chief Public Prosecutor Shishir Hiray maintained the State's position, citing a gathering on June 8, 2020, as the precursor to the incident. According to the State, witness statements from friends present at the scene consistently pointed toward suicide. Although a second inquiry was launched following public outcry, officials reached the same conclusion. However, the court noted a significant timing discrepancy: while Sushant Singh Rajput received an autopsy within 24 hours of his death, Salian’s post-mortem was delayed by three days.

Key Facts

  • Disha Salian died on June 8, 2020, following a fall from a building in Mumbai.
  • The Mumbai Police registered an Accidental Death Report (ADR) but refused to file an FIR for murder.
  • Forensic experts hired by the Salian family claim injury marks are inconsistent with the height of the fall.
  • Autopsy and ADR documents were withheld from the family for five years following the incident.
  • The court has directed the petitioner to provide a chronological list of circumstances that suggest a cognizable offense occurred.

What Happens Next

The Bombay High Court has adjourned the matter for a future hearing. Justice Dangre has instructed the petitioner to submit a detailed, point-by-point chronology of events. This document will serve as the basis for the State to respond to specific allegations of criminal conduct and procedural lapses.

Source: The Hindu — National

Related stories