Project Chintan

Reconciling Conservation and Livelihoods: The Western Ghats ESA Stalemate

India's struggle to secure the ecologically fragile Western Ghats faces ongoing friction between central conservation mandates and state-level economic concerns. Decades of shifting expert recommendations and local resistance have left the region's legal protection in a state of flux.

· 2 min read
Updated

Key takeaways

  • The 2010 Gadgil report proposed extensive Ecologically Sensitive Areas (ESA) across 142 talukas, sparking long-term political resistance.
  • A 2012 review by Krishnaswamy Kasturirangan reduced the proposed protected area to 37% of the Western Ghats to balance economic needs.
  • Karnataka remains a primary opponent, citing concerns over satellite mapping accuracy and the impact on coffee and rubber plantations.
  • The Union government has extended the current expert panel's tenure until 2027 to resolve disputes with Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka.
  • Indigenous forest communities are seen as vital biocultural bridges whose displacement could harm long-term conservation efforts.
Reconciling Conservation and Livelihoods: The Western Ghats ESA Stalemate

The Western Ghats, a UNESCO World Heritage site since 2012, spans six states and hosts 39 high-priority biodiversity hotspots. Protecting this biological treasury has remained a point of administrative friction since 2010, when the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP), led by ecologist Madhav Gadgil, proposed designating 142 talukas across 44 districts as Ecologically Sensitive Areas (ESA). This proposal sought to regulate human activity under the Environment Protection Act of 1986, yet it triggered immediate political and local pushback.

A Decade of Legislative Gridlock

Following opposition to the Gadgil report, the central government commissioned a 2012 review by a high-level group chaired by Krishnaswamy Kasturirangan. This group recommended a scaled-back approach, limiting restrictions to 37% of the landscape to preserve local livelihoods. Despite this compromise, consensus remained elusive. Between 2015 and 2026, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) issued five separate draft notifications, all of which lapsed without finalization.

In 2022, a new expert panel under Sanjay Kumar was formed to mediate state concerns. Current developments indicate a potential shift toward a "phased rollout" or state-by-state finalization. While Gujarat and Goa have signaled cooperation, Maharashtra is seeking further review, and discussions continue with Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka.

The Karnataka Friction Point

Karnataka represents a significant hurdle, with 20,668 square kilometers earmarked for ESA status. Successive state administrations have resisted the designation, citing threats to mining, infrastructure, and the agricultural interests of the 23.4% of the state's population residing in the Ghats. Field research conducted across districts like Chikkamagaluru, Kodagu, and Udupi reveals deep-seated anxieties among residents near sites like the Kali Tiger Reserve and Kudremukh National Park.

  • Data Accuracy: Stakeholders argue that satellite mapping fails to differentiate between natural forest canopy and agricultural plantations like coffee, rubber, and arecanut.
  • Land Rights: Long-term non-tribal residents near Balahalli Reserved Forest face frequent rejections of forest rights claims despite generations of occupancy.
  • Economic Fear: Many villagers mistakenly believe ESA status implies a 10-kilometer buffer zone leading to mandatory eviction.

Integrating Indigenous Stewardship

Effective conservation requires more than administrative boundaries; it necessitates the inclusion of indigenous forest-dwelling communities. These groups maintain a sustainable, symbiotic relationship with the environment that serves as a vital link between the wild and mainstream society. Excluding these populations or ignoring their biocultural contributions risks undermining the very ecosystems the government intends to save. While local officials support curbs on quarrying and unplanned tourism, the path forward demands a science-based dialogue that addresses ground-level realities rather than relying solely on remote sensing.

Source: The Hindu — Sci-Tech

Related stories