Project Chintan

Delhi Police Assume Control of Noida Case Involving Alleged Insults Toward Prime Minister

Authorities transferred an FIR against 25-year-old Ruchika Singh to Delhi after she was accused of using objectionable language against the Prime Minister. The legal move coincides with a surge in digital harassment and doxxing targeting female protesters from the Jantar Mantar demonstrations.

· 2 min read
Updated

Key takeaways

  • The case against Ruchika Singh involves BNS sections for defamation and public mischief following a zero FIR filed in Noida.
  • Delhi's Parliament Street police station will now lead the investigation into the alleged abusive remarks against the Prime Minister.
  • Multiple female protesters from the Jantar Mantar demonstrations report being targeted by doxxing and threats of physical violence.
  • Legal experts warn that Indian law currently lacks a specific definition for doxxing, creating a grey area for digital harassment victims.
Delhi Police Assume Control of Noida Case Involving Alleged Insults Toward Prime Minister

Case Transfer to New Delhi Following Zero FIR

A criminal investigation against Ruchika Singh, a Noida resident accused of using abusive language against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has been relocated to the Parliament Street police station in Delhi. Deputy Commissioner of Police (New Delhi) Sachin Sharma confirmed on Friday that the case is being transitioned, noting that specific legal strategies will be determined upon receipt of the formal files. The proceedings began Wednesday when Uttar Pradesh police filed a 'zero FIR' under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). This legal mechanism allows any station to record a complaint regardless of the location of the alleged offense.

The initial complaint, lodged by Ghaziabad resident Smriti Singh, invokes BNS Sections 352 for intentional insult, 353(1) for public mischief statements, and 356(1) for defamation. The complainant asserts that the 25-year-old’s remarks compromised the dignity of the Prime Minister's constitutional office and were calculated to incite hatred.

Political Blowback and Claims of Law Misuse

The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) has condemned the police action as an overreach of state power. CJP spokesperson Saurav Das argued that profanity should not qualify as a criminal matter, suggesting that law enforcement resources are being mismanaged. CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke further criticized the move, claiming a double standard exists where youth are targeted for speech that goes unpunished when used by high-ranking political figures. These tensions follow the recent conclusion of a 36-day protest at Jantar Mantar, which ended on July 25 after the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

Digital Harassment and the Legal Gap in Doxxing

Since the protest concluded, several women have faced severe online retaliation. Social media accounts, including those linked to political units like the BJP's Uttar Pradesh social media cell and platforms like 'The Jaipur Dialogues,' have circulated videos of protesters. These posts often encourage identification and 'lessons' for the subjects. Activists like Neha, president of the All India Students’ Association, have been specifically targeted. The fallout has seen personal information, including phone numbers and home addresses, leaked online alongside threats of sexual violence and death.

  • A 19-year-old protester reported deleting her digital presence entirely due to fears that viral doxxing would force her to return home.
  • Troll accounts frequently conflate offensive speech with illegal speech to justify the harassment of female activists.
  • Digital rights expert Aparajita Bharti of TQH Consulting notes that Indian law lacks a specific definition for doxxing, leaving it in a legal grey area.

Bharti highlighted that while sexual threats are actionable under current law, the act of publishing private data is not explicitly covered. She noted that while cyber cells can request content removal from platforms, the lack of a legal framework often results in women withdrawing from public online discourse to ensure their safety.

Source: The Hindu — National

Related stories