---
title: "CJP slams disallowing of NEET questions in Lok Sabha"
url: https://projectchintan.com/article/neet-questions-disallowed-lok-sabha-gswlf
publisher: Project Chintan
author: Project Chintan Newsroom
section: Politics
published: 2026-08-16T11:30:30.560Z
modified: 2026-08-16T14:00:07.632Z
language: en-IN
---

# CJP slams disallowing of NEET questions in Lok Sabha

CJP's Saurav Das says three sets of questions on NEET protests and related issues were disallowed in the Lok Sabha during the monsoon session, at the government's alleged behest. He questions why Home Minister Amit Shah did not address Parliament and notes protests and a ministerial resignation conn

## Key takeaways

- Three sets of questions about NEET-UG 2026 and student protests were disallowed in the Lok Sabha.
- Saurav Das alleges the move was at the Union government’s request and cites Rule 41(2) as the rationale.
- The episode is tied to protests at Jantar Mantar and the resignation of the Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

## What Happened

The Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) and its co-convenor Saurav Das criticised parliamentary proceedings after three sets of questions about NEET-UG 2026 and student protests were disallowed during the Lok Sabha session. Das said the questions were blocked at the Union government’s behest and pointed to topics including refunds of NEET-UG 2026 application fees, the government’s handling of protests, and provisions for protesters’ basic amenities in Delhi. He also highlighted the absence of Home Minister Amit Shah from Parliament during those weeks and referenced negotiations that ended the Jantar Mantar protests and the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan.

Across sources, the questions cited covered refunds for NEET-UG 2026, public distrust in government, denial of drinking water and sanitation to protesters, government engagement with protesting students, education reforms and paper leaks, and the treatment of peaceful protestors.

## Why It Matters

Supporters argue that restricting questions undermines the Question Hour’s role in holding the executive to account. By framing the disallowance as an attempt to shield the government from scrutiny, Das reframed parliamentary accountability as essential for addressing student concerns and NEET administration. The episode is tied to broader debates about youth protests, NEET governance, and ministerial accountability in education policy.

## Background

The protests linked to NEET-UG 2026 included a weeks-long demonstration at Jantar Mantar and culminated in negotiations with the government and the resignation of the education minister. MP Matheswaran V.S. (from Tamil Nadu) is cited as the member who submitted the questions cited in notices referenced during the session. The parliamentary authorities cited Rule 41(2), including several clauses, to disallow the questions.

## Key Facts

- Three sets of Lok Sabha questions on NEET-UG 2026 and student protests were disallowed during the monsoon session.
- The questions were said to address refunds of NEET-UG 2026 application fees, public distrust in the government, and treatment of protesters in Delhi, among other issues.
- Notice Reference Nos. 101799 and 101801 were mentioned as the basis for the questions.
- Parliamentary authorities cited Rule 41(2) and specific clauses (i, iv, v, xviii, xxii) to disallow the questions.
- Saurav Das claimed the disallowance occurred at the Union government’s behest and criticised the absence of the Home Minister from Parliament during the concerns’ period.
- There was an associated resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan after negotiations related to the protests.

## What Happens Next

Sources do not provide a concrete next-step schedule. The discourse centers on parliamentary accountability and future handling of similar questions, with proponents urging Parliament to function as a forum for government scrutiny rather than a formal gatekeeper for executive decisions.

---
Canonical: https://projectchintan.com/article/neet-questions-disallowed-lok-sabha-gswlf
Reported from: Multiple Sources